![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
General Discussion | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
<< Prev Page of 2 |
Author | Message |
gdfellows
Administrator ![]() Site Creator Joined: 04 March 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 237 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've scanned all PDFs here at 300 dpi. I do use the "reduce file size" option in Adobe Acrobat. Edited by gdfellows - 04 September 2006 at 9:32pm |
|
![]() |
|
DemiPuppet
Administrator ![]() Joined: 27 May 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 163 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think a sharp lowpass filter at 8Khz is best, otherwise some of the sibilants will get lost.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibilant If the recording is in stereo, make sure it's converted to mono. This will reduce the hiss by a few dB. If the recording is really miserable, you could try using an expander. For example, some of the Turkish tapes were recorded at a really low audio level. In order to pull the sound out of the hiss, I would amplify only the audio with an amplitude greater than the hiss level.
http://normalize.nongnu.org/ http://sox.sourceforge.net/ Since the Turkish 2, Vietnamese, and Swedish tapes weren't too bad sounding, I didn't perform this step on them. Probably should have. |
|
![]() |
|
Sir Nigel
Contributor ![]() Joined: 16 March 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 35 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
DemiPuppet, how would converting to mono alone reduce hiss? Is it by perception only?
Obviously stereo is pointless for all FSI courses, but I would imagine the "rubbish in, rubbish out" rule would apply unless you're using a noise reduction plug-in.
In addition I've saved my PDFs using JPEG 2000 and the file size is tremendously lower than regular PDFs. |
|
Insurance Excuse:
The accident was due to the road bending. |
|
![]() |
|
DemiPuppet
Administrator ![]() Joined: 27 May 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 163 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The assumption is that the hiss is in each channel is totally random while the desired signal is nearly identical. So when the left and right channels are added together, the total "good" signal is doubled (+6dB). But since the noise is random, sometimes it adds together and sometimes it subtracts. Totally random noise will add as a "Root Mean Sum" and only increase by 3dB.
When converting to mono, the two stereo channel signals are summed together and then divided by 2 (in other words reduced by 6dB). So now the mono "good" signal is back to it's original level, but the hiss is reduced by 3dB. The hiss amplitude will be reduced to ~0.707 of its original value. As a bonus, going to mono means that the precious bits used by the MP3 encoder can be dedicated to just one channel rather than being wasted trying to also encode the differences between the channels. I suspect the original recodings were all in mono anyway. One additional way to maximize the use of the MP3 bits is to filter out all the high frequencies (>8Khz) and then downsample to 22050 Hz. According to the Nyquist-Shannon's sampling theorem, the sampling rate needs to be only twice the highest signal frequency in order to perfectly reproduce the sound. By reducing the number of samples, less MP3 bits are needed to produce the same quality of signal. Of course you could keep the same MP3 bit rate and thus improve the quality. I know it seems odd that reducing the sampling rate would actually improve the final signal quality, but it's true. I use the SOX command line program to do the resampling after filtering out the high frequencies. |
|
![]() |
|
<< Prev Page of 2 |
![]() ![]() |
||
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |